Interview With Service Marketing Thought Leader, Mike Schultz

But Wellesley Hills is more than a plain, pedestrian, garden-variety consulting firm plodding through life project by project. It's really a think tank.
Mike is also one of the co-conspirators behind RainToday, an online knowledge repository for professional service firms.
The topic of our discussion was Mike and his partners' recent research study, entitled "What's Working in Lead Generation."
The report categorises professional firms into four groups in terms of their ability to generate high quality sales leads: Excellent, good, fair and poor.
One big difference between the two opposing ends of the scale is that 91% of the excellent firms know the decision-makers by name, so their first contact may be cold, but they have the advantage of being able to address the buyer by name.
In case of the fair and the poor group, only 13% of them know the names. Most of their contacts are made with nebulous entities like "Dear Sir", "Dear Madam" and "Dear President." of course, if you are not addressed by name, why should you respond.
The other distinguishing factor is that firms in the poor and fair groups are prospecting for instant sales.
The other interesting finding of the report is the three most effective ways of generating quality sales leads are...
- Making warm phone calls to current contacts
- Speaking at conferences and trade shows
- Running your own in-person events
- Client / partner referrals
- General Referrals
- Cold Calling / telephone prospecting
They blame the direct mail method, although the problem lies in their own inability to properly apply it to their businesses.
The other important point is to understand and apply the two-step lead generation process. First we have to offer something valuable and only then we can expect people to give us their money.
And here lies the difference between hunting and fishing...
When hunting, people chase their preys and kill them individually. The approach works if you try to feed only your family. But if your job is to hunt enough to feed a town of 100,000 people, then you've got a problem. In order to generate your "quota", you have to hire an army of hunters and manage them, buy them weapons and ammunition, not to mention that you have to share the catch with them.
On the other hand, fishing is drastically different. I used to be a fisherman, so gained some - about 10 years - first-hand experience. I would select a good location on a certain river or pond, and would start "feeding the location." I would feed the location to entice a large amount of fish. And the combination of the environment and the bait defined what kind of fish would come. I had a clearly defined "Ideal Fish" profile in mind.
And you know what? The fish came. After a few weeks of feeding, there was a preponderance of fish at the location. I would just sit down, cast my hook and pull out the fish. There was no chasing and no struggle. The process was pretty effortless. But it needed the foresight and the patience of only feeding but not fishing the location for a few weeks.
But it didn't work for everyone. Why? Because most people didn't have the time to feed the location. They wanted instant gratification. So, they were chasing the fish from location to location.
Similarly, this kind of magnetic lead generation, based on attraction, doesn't work for many consulting firms because they are too busy chasing and hunting prospects, a large percentage of whom are suspects. And every hunter knows that when you're chasing animals, they run away from you. Thus, when you chase prospects, they run away from you.